June 2017
The financial sector is notorious for arriving to technology late. Facilitating change in large corporations is difficult, with workforces very set in their ways and processes which have diverged from what was likely a standard practice originally.
Often this is felt even more when dealing with processes outside of the direct business in which these corporations are dealing. Investments are made in customer facing applications (naturally) and operational processes such as facilities management and finance are left as a lower priority.
To travel on behalf of the company required engaging in an endless exchange of emails back and forth with managers, travel advisors, and finance staff to agree on the best flights, hotels, and other amenities. Approvals were gathered through email chains, and the decision making process was impossible to follow, track or audit.
Coming back from a trip was just as painful, with anyone looking to claim back expenses incurred required to wander through the intranet in search of a form which they HAD to print, manually complete and staple receipts to, before then having these lost in the midst of in-trays and other paperwork of approving managers.
Something had to change. Regional managers wanted to know more about how much travel was being done by staff. Global directives were filtering down to encourage more online meetings to limit our impact on the environment. Expenses incurred outside of procurement processes needed to be more tightly controlled to get the best from purchases being done by multiple offices across the globe.
A global system was decided on, and needed to be rolled out ASAP. But, global delivery teams were struggling to gather all the requirements of local jurisdictions. While tax and financial reporting requirements seemed reasonably consistent within European Borders, coming to Asia-Pacific these teams quickly discovered that processes were more complicated.
They relied on local project managers to make sense of all this. With both analysis skills and project management backgrounds, we were able to better assess the requirements of our jurisdiction, and distill these down to specifications for the new system.
After 6 months of requirements analysis and iterating on a test application, the local business finally agreed on a configuration that would enable far easier management of travel and expenses whilst still ensuring that local approval and reporting requirements were met.
While we faced some resistence from those who had worked with the old processes for longer than we had been in our working lives, gradually the entire company in both Australia and New Zealand came around, and we became the advisors to the rollout across Asia-Pacific.